In a significant move to support the operational continuity of religious organizations across the United States, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has officially implemented a new final rule aimed at reducing the long wait times facing thousands of religious workers. As of early 2026, this policy shift represents a major victory for churches, synagogues, mosques, and other non-profit religious institutions that rely on the specialized skills of international ministers and non-minister religious workers.

For years, the “Special Immigrant Religious Worker” program has been plagued by backlogs, often forcing essential community leaders to leave the country because their temporary R-1 status expired before their permanent residency could be processed. The new DHS rule is designed to break this cycle.

The News: Streamlining the R-1 to Green Card Pipeline

The core of the USCIS announcement focuses on increasing the efficiency of the Form I-360 (Petition for Amerasian, Widow(er), or Special Immigrant) process. Under the previous administration of these regulations, many religious workers faced a “bottleneck” where they could not move forward with their adjustment of status until a lengthy initial petition was approved.

Key Changes in the 2026 Regulatory Landscape:

  • Reduced Administrative Delays: USCIS is now utilizing expanded resources to prioritize the adjudication of religious worker petitions, aiming to bring wait times back within a manageable “6-month” window.

  • Enhanced Flexibility for R-1 Holders: The rule provides clearer pathways for religious workers to maintain their legal status while transitioning from temporary R-1 status to the EB-4 (Special Immigrant) category.

  • Protection for Religious Organizations: By speeding up these approvals, DHS is ensuring that religious institutions do not suffer from sudden staffing vacancies that disrupt community services, youth programs, and spiritual leadership.

Why This Matters: The EB-4 Category Crisis

The religious worker community has faced immense pressure over the last several years due to the “EB-4” visa category being combined with other “special immigrant” groups, leading to retrogression and years-long waits for visas to become available.

By reducing the internal processing times at USCIS, the government is at least ensuring that the “paperwork phase” is handled swiftly, even if the “visa availability phase” remains subject to annual caps. This allows religious workers to secure their place in the queue much earlier, providing greater legal stability for their families and the congregations they serve.

Strategic Tips for Religious Organizations in 2026

  1. File Early: Do not wait until an R-1 worker is in their fourth or fifth year to begin the I-360 process. The new rule favors those who are proactive in their filings.

  2. Ensure Strict Compliance: USCIS has noted that while wait times are decreasing, site visits and fraud prevention measures remain high. Ensure all “Evidence of Religious Work” is meticulously documented.

  3. Coordinate with Legal Counsel: The intersection of R-1 non-immigrant status and EB-4 immigrant petitions is technically demanding. One clerical error can still result in a denial, despite the faster processing speeds.

While the DHS’s commitment to reducing wait times is a welcome relief for the faith-based community, the religious worker visa remains one of the most scrutinized categories in U.S. immigration law. The faster processing speeds mean that the “Requests for Evidence” (RFEs) are also coming faster, requiring organizations to be more prepared than ever before. A single misstep in documenting a worker’s religious vocation or the organization’s financial ability to pay can lead to a swift denial. To ensure your religious institution is fully compliant with the new 2026 regulations and to maximize the chances of a successful petition for your spiritual leaders, contact Lforlaw today to connect with expert immigration attorneys who specialize in religious worker visas and international clergy transitions.


Sources